<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Estately Blog &#187; Maps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.estately.com/category/maps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.estately.com</link>
	<description>A blog of growth, strategy, development and design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:20:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why Maps Matter for Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://blog.estately.com/2011/02/maps-and-burying-the-living/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=maps-and-burying-the-living</link>
		<comments>http://blog.estately.com/2011/02/maps-and-burying-the-living/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 22:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Galen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Maps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.estately.com/?p=663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If we are to believe Greg Robertson, (Another nail in the coffin for map search?), the coffin is being hammered shut on real estate map search as I type because one of our competitors pulled their map prototype after a week or two in the wild. But Greg is blurring product type with product execution and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-679" title="RIP the Tablet" src="http://blog.estately.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/RIP-the-Tablet-470x369.jpg" alt="" width="470" height="369" /></p>
<p>If we are to believe Greg Robertson, (<a href="http://www.vendoralley.com/2011/02/10/another-nail-in-the-coffin-for-map-search/">Another nail in the coffin for map search?</a>), the coffin is being hammered shut on real estate map search as I type because one of our competitors pulled their map prototype after a week or two in the wild.</p>
<p>But Greg is blurring product type with product execution and product audience.</p>
<p>When a company fails to successfully execute a feature, product or business, it does not mean that feature is dead. Apple, for instance, is a company that seems to exclusively create market segments where others failed so many times that the segment was considered dead (<a href="http://partylemon.com/articles/7.html">remember</a> <a href="http://www.life.com/image/1597287">these?</a>). <a href="http://www.weebly.com/">Weebly</a> <a href="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/weebly.com/">grew like a weed</a> at the exact same time that <a href="http://arstechnica.com/web/news/2009/04/geocities-to-close-after-15-years-of-aesthetic-awesomeness.ars">Yahoo decided Geocities was a dead business</a>. Coupon sites have existed since the dawn of the internet, but Groupon got the formula just right. Close to my heart, <a href="http://www.allbusiness.com/technology/computer-software/805067-1.html">Home Advisor&#8217;s failure</a> wasn&#8217;t an indicator that people didn&#8217;t want to use the internet to find homes online, it just meant they went about it the wrong way.</p>
<div>
<p>Map search is alive and well in real estate: Estately&#8217;s surging user base is just one indicator of its health (more on that sometime soon). Traffic growth aside, the root of many of our feature requests is asking us to tweak our map interface: our customers don&#8217;t want us to run from maps; they want our maps to work harder for them.</p>
</div>
<p>While maps can be tricky for novices, they provide a world of information that merely selecting &#8220;<a href="http://www.estately.com/CA/90210/type-resi">90210</a>&#8221; from a drop down and looking at a list of results doesn&#8217;t provide. Our users often tell us that they don&#8217;t care about arbitrary zip code boundaries or neighborhood boundaries &#8211; they want to see the homes for sale on a map and pick which ones they are interested in for themselves (they do care about <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://blog.estately.com/2010/11/03/estately-smart-schools-a-new-way-to-find-a-home/">school boundaries though</a></span>). When users do care about zip code or city boundaries, they still want to see if homes are on major streets or near parks before they decide to learn more about them.</p>
<p>Maps are not the logical search medium for most other industries. Hotels need to be in the area, but factors like major vs. minor street, corner vs. middle of the street and proximity to parks and amenities aren&#8217;t nearly as important for hotel seekers. Restaurants are in the same category &#8211; the price is primarily for the food and sometimes the view, and eating a block from the freeway isn&#8217;t as scary as <a href="http://www.usc.edu/uscnews/stories/11614.html">living there</a>. But in real estate, a marker on a map tells you more about a house or condo than a thousand words could.</p>
<p>So why do most of our competitors stick to list search &#8211; and even go so far as to say that their internal testing shows that list search is better for users?</p>
<p>Three reasons:</p>
<ol>
<li>Map search is extremely hard to get right. Getting map search right is like cooking a chicken &#8211; half baked isn&#8217;t half as good, it just makes you sick. Map search unfortunately defies a lot of the incremental, iterative Lean Startup advice; there is no incremental shift from list search to map search that is useful or an improvement until you have fully made the leap.</li>
<li>Another problem with map search is that it&#8217;s difficult to figure out if you got it right. A lot of traditional usability studies involve testing with people off the street or people who are in your target audience (i.e., thinking of buying a home). Map search is typically best for consumers who are dedicated to buying a home or being a real estate junkie; it annoys dilettantes.</li>
<li>Lastly, maps just aren&#8217;t conducive to wall-to-wall ads. Our competitors attempt to help real estate agents and others wiggle into people&#8217;s psyches while they&#8217;re trying to find a home they want. Our business on the other hand is driven by helping people find and buy homes online.</li>
</ol>
<p>We believe maps-done-right are a core part of what has helped Estately grow and prosper. We are glad that they&#8217;re hard to get right and we are very excited about the improvements we have in the pipeline. The fact that our competition is dropping out of the game &#8211; along with consistent growth we&#8217;re seeing in new and return traffic &#8211; just helps confirm that our hard work is paying off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.estately.com/2011/02/maps-and-burying-the-living/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From the mail: What does BOM mean?</title>
		<link>http://blog.estately.com/2008/10/from-the-mail-what-does-bom-mean/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=from-the-mail-what-does-bom-mean</link>
		<comments>http://blog.estately.com/2008/10/from-the-mail-what-does-bom-mean/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Galen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Glossary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.estately.com/2008/10/27/from-the-mail-what-does-bom-mean/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An Estately power-user asks &#8220;what the heck does BOM mean?&#8221; Is it a Bank Owned Mansion? Bom Chicka Wah Wah? It actually has nothing to do with &#8220;Bank Owned.&#8221; In the cut-off, use-every-available-letter-in-the-description-allowed world of real estate listings, BOM is shorthand for &#8220;Back On Market.&#8221; It means someone was trying to sell their home, got [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An Estately power-user asks <strong>&#8220;what the heck does BOM mean?&#8221;</strong> Is it a Bank Owned Mansion? <strong>Bom Chicka Wah Wah?</strong></p>
<p>It actually has nothing to do with &#8220;Bank Owned.&#8221; In the cut-off, use-every-available-letter-in-the-description-allowed world of real estate listings, BOM is shorthand for &#8220;Back On Market.&#8221; It means someone was trying to sell their home, got an offer on it and accepted it, and for whatever reason the person who was going to buy the home backed out. </p>
<p>Why would someone disclose BOM when it could mean that the inspection found something nasty? By their very nature, BOM homes have high DOM (Days On Market). The days in escrow still count against the CDOM (Cumulative Days On Market). </p>
<p>By disclosing that it is Back On Market, the person selling their home is saying &#8220;it hasn&#8217;t been sitting on the market for weeks and weeks because it&#8217;s a bad deal, it is because the person who was going to buy it backed out.&#8221;</p>
<p>A quick look down the West Coast shows that the use of BOM is regional. It&#8217;s a lot more popular in <a href='http://www.estately.com/CA/Los_Angeles'>Los Angeles</a> than anywhere else &#8211; I&#8217;m seeing <a href='http://www.estately.com/CA/33.5723,-119.3019,34.4692,-117.5235/text-bom'>66 properties with &#8220;BOM&#8221; in the description</a> there as of today. I&#8217;m only seeing 3 &#8220;BOM&#8221; properties in the Puget Sound area. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.estately.com/2008/10/from-the-mail-what-does-bom-mean/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who owns the west?</title>
		<link>http://blog.estately.com/2008/08/who-owns-the-west/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=who-owns-the-west</link>
		<comments>http://blog.estately.com/2008/08/who-owns-the-west/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 18:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Galen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[off topic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.estately.com/2008/08/07/who-owns-the-west/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This map is amazing. (from Strange Maps)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This map is amazing.</p>
<p><img id="image215" src="http://blog.estately.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/map-owns_the_west.jpg" alt="map-owns_the_west.jpg" /></p>
<p>(from <a href='http://strangemaps.wordpress.com/2008/06/17/291-federal-lands-in-the-us/'>Strange Maps</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.estately.com/2008/08/who-owns-the-west/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Terrain on Google maps</title>
		<link>http://blog.estately.com/2007/11/terrain-on-google-maps/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=terrain-on-google-maps</link>
		<comments>http://blog.estately.com/2007/11/terrain-on-google-maps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Galen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.estately.com/2007/11/30/terrain-on-google-maps/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can now see the hills and valleys of America on Google maps. It&#8217;s not available for non-Google sites yet (including Estately). I love being able to see the direction of the valleys left after the retreat of the Cordilleran Glaciers just 10,000 years ago. Here is an example that is just south of Bremerton: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can now see the hills and valleys of America on Google maps. It&#8217;s not available for non-Google sites yet (including Estately). I love being able to see the direction of the valleys left after the retreat of the <a href="http://geology.isu.edu/Digital_Geology_Idaho/Module13/IceSheet.gif">Cordilleran Glaciers just 10,000 years ago</a>. Here is an example that is just south of <a href="http://www.estately.com/p/WA_Bremerton">Bremerton</a>:</p>
<p><iframe width="425" height="350" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" src="http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&amp;t=p&amp;om=1&amp;ll=47.456184,-122.668533&amp;spn=0.161104,0.32135&amp;z=12&amp;output=embed&amp;s=AARTsJqzARj-Z8VnW5pkPMLMmZbqrJcYpw"></iframe><br /><small><a href="http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&amp;t=p&amp;om=1&amp;ll=47.456184,-122.668533&amp;spn=0.161104,0.32135&amp;z=12&amp;source=embed" style="color:#0000FF;text-align:left">View Larger Map</a></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.estately.com/2007/11/terrain-on-google-maps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where do Seattle&#8217;s neighborhood names come from</title>
		<link>http://blog.estately.com/2007/11/where-do-seattles-neighborhood-names-come-from/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=where-do-seattles-neighborhood-names-come-from</link>
		<comments>http://blog.estately.com/2007/11/where-do-seattles-neighborhood-names-come-from/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Galen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neighborhoods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[text search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.estately.com/2007/11/16/where-do-seattles-neighborhood-names-come-from/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marketers and developers &#8211; the same place as nearly any other young city. I like the concept that even the oldest and hoity-toitiest Seattle neighborhood names come from developers: But even Seattle&#8217;s crunchiest neighborhood got its name from land developers, who named it after their hometown in Fremont, Neb. Capitol Hill owes its name to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/339703_names15.html?source=rss">Marketers and developers</a> &#8211; the same place as nearly any other young city. I like the concept that even the oldest and hoity-toitiest Seattle neighborhood names come from developers:</p>
<blockquote><p>But even Seattle&#8217;s crunchiest neighborhood got its name from land developers, who named it after their hometown in Fremont, Neb.</p>
<p>Capitol Hill owes its name to turn-of-the-century superdeveloper James Moore, who bought property and persuaded a state legislator to introduce a bill to move the state capital there.</p>
<p>&#8220;It was really just a real estate promotion,&#8221; said Seattle historian Paul Dorpat. &#8220;There was no chance in hell they would do that &#8230; but he knew he could get publicity.&#8221;</p>
<p>Another name that stuck first appeared in a Seattle Weekly article in the late 1980s about how the industrial area south of downtown was changing with new businesses and artists moving in. Editor Rose Pike suggested the name Sodo for SOuth of the soon-to-be-blown-up KingDOme.</p>
<p>The name really caught on after developer Frank Stagen erected red neon signs on top of the area&#8217;s huge Sears building &#8212; until Starbucks replaced them with its mermaid. </p></blockquote>
<p>I personally like descriptive, genuinely bottom up names like &#8220;Pill Hill&#8221; (aka &#8220;first hill&#8221;), &#8220;Frelard&#8221; (Between Ballard and Fremont), and the Denny Regrade (the area where they dragged tons of dirt from the top of Denny St. its base, thus regrading it).</p>
<p>A quick check using our text search shows no one (not a soul!) advertising a &#8220;West Edge,&#8221; &#8220;Park District,&#8221; or &#8220;Midtown&#8221; property. Maybe the Park District developer should learn from history and get his state legislator to promote a resolution to move Olympic National Park to North of downtown. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.estately.com/2007/11/where-do-seattles-neighborhood-names-come-from/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The virtual land rush rages on</title>
		<link>http://blog.estately.com/2007/11/the-virtual-land-rush-rages-on/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-virtual-land-rush-rages-on</link>
		<comments>http://blog.estately.com/2007/11/the-virtual-land-rush-rages-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 20:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Galen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domains]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.estately.com/2007/11/02/the-virtual-land-rush-rages-on/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sure, the Seattle-area real estate market is slowing down to â€œnormalâ€ rates while the rest of the nation wonders how long the downturn will last. But the online land rush, the domain land rush, is still going strong. Computer.com just sold for $2.2 million. Investment.com for $900k. No Bank of America no-fee-but-still-bad-deal loans available for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, the Seattle-area real estate market is slowing down to â€œnormalâ€ rates while the rest of the nation wonders how long the downturn will last. But the online land rush, the domain land rush, is still going strong. <a href="http://blog.domaintools.com/2007/10/monikertraffic-auction-results/ ">Computer.com just sold for $2.2 million. Investment.com for $900k</a>. No <a href="http://blog.inman.com/inmanblog/2007/10/bofas-no-fee-lo.html">Bank of America no-fee-but-still-bad-deal loans</a> available for these guys. </p>
<p>Off topic, but sort of on topic, here&#8217;s one map of the domains of the world (unfortunately size is not proportionate to registrations):</p>
<p><a class="imagelink" href="http://blog.estately.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/cctld_1200.jpg" title="domains of the world"><img id="image103" src="http://blog.estately.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/cctld_1200.jpg" alt="domains of the world" height="402" width="600" /></a></p>
<p>via: <a href="http://strangemaps.wordpress.com/2007/10/17/190-world-wide-web-map-from-ad-to-za/">StrangeMaps</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.estately.com/2007/11/the-virtual-land-rush-rages-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A.PlaceBetween.Us</title>
		<link>http://blog.estately.com/2007/10/a-placebetween-us/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-placebetween-us</link>
		<comments>http://blog.estately.com/2007/10/a-placebetween-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Galen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.estately.com/2007/10/29/a-placebetween-us/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like tiny, single purpose web apps, even if I immediately forget their names. Here&#8217;s my app of the day: a.placebetween.us. Give it 2 or more addresses and what you are meeting about and it will give you suggestions right in the middle of your places. Note: not that helpful if you are a Seattleitte [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like tiny, single purpose web apps, even if I immediately forget their names. Here&#8217;s my app of the day: <a href="http://a.placebetween.us/">a.placebetween.us</a>. Give it 2 or more addresses and what you are meeting about and it will give you suggestions right in the middle of your places. Note: not that helpful if you are a Seattleitte meeting with Eastsiders. </p>
<p>via: <a href="http://briandorsey.info/">Brian Dorsey</a> (founder of <a href="http://www.noonhat.com/lunch/">NoonHat</a>), who faintly reminds me of <a href="http://www.raincityguide.com/author/dustin">Dustin Luther</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.spotstory.com/2007/06/01/aplacebetweenacrowd/">More from their blog</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.estately.com/2007/10/a-placebetween-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maps demand more screen real estate</title>
		<link>http://blog.estately.com/2007/10/maps-demand-more-screen-real-estate/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=maps-demand-more-screen-real-estate</link>
		<comments>http://blog.estately.com/2007/10/maps-demand-more-screen-real-estate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 17:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Galen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.estately.com/2007/10/12/maps-demand-more-screen-real-estate/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you have a big screen, Estately is one of the only real estate search sites that will fill it up with real estate search goodness. Small screen? We shrink to your level unless it&#8217;s tiny. Seriously: go to Estately&#8217;s Seattle real estate page now and try resizing your browser &#8211; see how everything scales [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have a big screen, Estately is one of the only real estate search sites that will fill it up with real estate search goodness. Small screen? We shrink to your level unless it&#8217;s tiny. Seriously: go to <a href="http://www.estately.com/p/Wa_Seattle_">Estately&#8217;s Seattle real estate</a> page now and try resizing your browser &#8211; see how everything scales to fit your needs? Regardless, some people have asked us for <strong>even more map</strong> and <strong>even more room for photos</strong> and today we deliver, but only if they really want it. </p>
<p>Hanging out between the map and the search options is a little triangle in a long thin bar. Click on it and Huzzah! the map is full screen. Once you&#8217;ve set up your search, you can shrink that sucker down and just cruise the map, going from listings to photos to neighborhood information. Want it back? The same bar is still hanging out on the left side of the map. Click it again and Huzzah! it&#8217;s like it was never gone.</p>
<p><strong>Before:</strong></p>
<p><img id="image98" src="http://blog.estately.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/search-open.jpg" alt="Search options open" height="347" width="480" /></p>
<p><strong>After:</strong></p>
<p><img id="image99" src="http://blog.estately.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/search-closed.jpg" alt="More screen real estate for the map" height="343" width="480" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.estately.com/2007/10/maps-demand-more-screen-real-estate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome to the man coast</title>
		<link>http://blog.estately.com/2007/08/welcome-to-the-man-coast/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=welcome-to-the-man-coast</link>
		<comments>http://blog.estately.com/2007/08/welcome-to-the-man-coast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 01:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Galen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.estately.com/2007/08/17/welcome-to-the-man-coast/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My suspicions were confirmed by Strange Maps the other day: as a Seattlite I am surrounded by a lot of dudes. Not just locally; all along the West Coast it&#8217;s as though we&#8217;re still feeling the effects of the gold rush of decades ago. I&#8217;m guessing the Microsoft area of Redmond bring up the stats [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="margin-bottom: 0in">My suspicions were confirmed by <a href="http://strangemaps.wordpress.com/">Strange Maps</a> the other day: as a Seattlite <a href="http://strangemaps.wordpress.com/2007/07/06/144-single-guys-live-in-la-single-girls-in-nyc/">I am surrounded by a lot of dudes</a>. Not just locally; all along the West Coast it&#8217;s as though we&#8217;re still feeling the effects of the gold rush of decades ago.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in">I&#8217;m guessing the Microsoft area of Redmond bring up the stats considerably, especially <a href="http://alacarte.lexisnexis.com/partners/int/google/landingpage.asp?id=20124452&#038;mtid=1&#038;ws=9j0hDk1UboE=&#038;ws_pub=THE%20SEATTLE%20POST-INTELLIGENCER&#038;ws_date=August%2016,%202006&#038;ws_len=1088&#038;ws_lni=4KNK-07S0-TX2J-B28R-00000-00&#038;ws_lastupdate=20060817&#038;ws_title=AT%20MICROSOFT,%2075%25%20OF%20THE&#038;ws_refer=http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=microsoft+percent+women+workforce&#038;btnG=Search+Archives&#038;um=1&#038;hl=en&#038;ie=ISO-8859-1">given their 75+% male makeup</a>. In fact, with <a href="http://blog.seattletimes.nwsource.com/techtracks/archives/2006/07/msft_headcount_detailed.html">33,000 Puget Sound employees</a>, Microsoft employs approximately 16,000 of the unmatched men in Seattle.</p>
<p><a class="imagelink" href="http://blog.shackprices.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/gender.jpg" title="gender gaps in the US"><img id="image70" src="http://blog.shackprices.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/gender.jpg" alt="gender gaps in the US" height="574" width="600" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.estately.com/2007/08/welcome-to-the-man-coast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

